nous: indemonstrable knowledge and aristotle's epistemic hexis (ii)
نویسندگان
چکیده
corresponding to the division of the scientific knowledge to demonstrable and indemonstrable knowledge in aristotle’s philosophy, the concept of nous has two interwoven senses. besides nous as the demonstrable scientific knowledge, it is also regarded as the hexis of the soul. there are three specific functions of this latter sense: i) acquiring principles on which the scientific knowledge is based; ii) understanding universals in actual sense perception and iii) conceiving universal propositions during induction (epagoge). nous as the origin of acquiring demonstrative knowledgeis, thus, both the process of acquiring demonstrable knowledge and its final result. the illumination of this point, it seems, can throw light on some of the common ambiguities about nous.
منابع مشابه
nous: indemonstrable knowledge and aristotle's epistemic hexis
in the last chapter of his posterior analytics, aristotle raises two questions about the archai of knowledge (epistêmê) that are to be answered by nous, the key concept which must be illustrated itself before getting the answers. while in both of these answers, as in some other passages, nous is introduced as the hexis of the soul, it is the second answer where nous is considered as one of the ...
متن کاملEpistemic Issues and Group Knowledge
Formal models for group knowledge can help philosophers gain additional insight into the ramifications of the philosophical concepts that they propose by clarifying the abstract properties of these concepts and their relationship to alternative proposals. To date, however, formal treatments of group knowledge have remained largely disjointed from the related philosophical discussions and are th...
متن کاملGroup Knowledge and Epistemic Defeat
If individual knowledge and justification can be vanquished by epistemic defeaters, then the same should go for group knowledge. Lackey (2014) has recently argued that one especially strong conception of group knowledge defended by Bird (2010) is incapable of explaining how it is that (group) knowledge is ever subject to ordinary mechanisms of epistemic defeat. Lackey takes it that her objectio...
متن کاملEpistemic Logic and Knowledge Management
In most textbooks on knowledge management (KM; e.g., [5]), there is no reference to epistemic concepts at all. In [8], there is even an explicit statement that epistemologic concepts of knowledge are “useless“ for KM, since KM seems to be about the use rather than the truth aspect of knowledge. However, there is a remarkably explicit reference to such concepts in [7] establishing the use of epi...
متن کاملProper Epistemic Knowledge Bases
Reasoning about the nested beliefs or knowledge of other agents is essential for many collaborative and competitive tasks. However, reasoning with nested belief (for example through epistemic logics) is computationally expensive. Proper Epistemic Knowledge Bases (PEKBs) address this by enforcing syntactic restrictions on the knowledge base. By compiling a PEKB and query formula into a specific ...
متن کاملEpistemic Alc-knowledge Bases
Statement of interest We consider the epistemic concept language proposed in 5], which has been used to formalize procedural rules and weak deenitions using a very restricted form of epis-temic sentences. Our statement is that there are a number of other uses of the epistemic operator that require diierent forms of epistemic sentences in the knowledge base. To justify this statement we brieey r...
متن کاملمنابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
فلسفهجلد ۴۲، شماره ۱، صفحات ۱۰۱-۱۱۴
کلمات کلیدی
میزبانی شده توسط پلتفرم ابری doprax.com
copyright © 2015-2023